Report: CDC Funds Controversial Danish Team, Per AI News Outlet

According to a report from GeneOnline AI, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has awarded a research grant to a group of Danish scientists known for publishing contentious studies, including analyses of vaccination data.

 

The GeneOnline AI "Newsflash," dated December 18, 2025, states that he researchers have established professional ties to Dr. Tracy Beth Høeg, an official within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The Source and Its Claims

The information originates from GeneOnline AI, an artificial intelligence-powered news service. In its brief, the service reported the grant allocation and highlighted the existing controversy surrounding the researchers' past work. The source did not specify the grant's monetary value but indicated the research area involves public health and vaccinations.

Details on the Researchers and FDA Link

As cited in the GeneOnline AI report, the Danish recipients have authored studies that challenge mainstream scientific consensus, particularly regarding vaccinations and pandemic-era policies. The report specifically notes that Dr. Tracy Beth Høeg of the FDA has previously collaborated with this team as a co-author, a connection that has drawn scrutiny to the CDC's grant-awarding process.

Read Also: Border 2 Movie: Sunny Deol Says Soldier’s Uniform ‘Gives Strength

Transparency Questions and Official Silence

The original GeneOnline AI bulletin stated that the CDC has not publicly commented on the grant or addressed potential conflict-of-interest questions arising from Høeg's association with the researchers. Key details absent from the initial report and not yet clarified by officials include:

• The precise objectives of the vaccination-related research.
• The formal grant review and selection criteria used by the CDC.
• Any recusals or disclosures made by involved parties regarding the FDA connection.

Why Sourcing Matters in This Story

This report underscores the importance of clear sourcing in science and health journalism. The claims are attributed to a specific, dated AI news report. The subsequent public and scientific discussion now hinges on official confirmation or clarification from the CDC and FDA to either substantiate or contextualize the initial report's claims, ensuring transparency in government-funded research.